<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mindaugas Mieldazys Weblog &#187; Domain Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mieldazys.com/category/domain-industry/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mieldazys.com</link>
	<description>Online business and promotion blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VeriSign Announces Increase in .com .net Domain Name Fees &#124; Domain Name Fees increase</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/verisign-announces-increase-in-com-net-domain-name-fees</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/verisign-announces-increase-in-com-net-domain-name-fees#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[com domains price increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net domains price increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VeriSign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My tip: renew your .com domains, which used/planning to use for long run&#8230; Original press release goes below. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA, Dec 17, 2009 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX News Network) &#8212; VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN), the trusted provider of Internet infrastructure services for the networked world, today announced, effective July 1, 2010, an increase in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My tip: renew your .com domains, which used/planning to use for long run&#8230;</p>
<p>Original press release goes below.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA, Dec 17, 2009 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX News Network) &#8212; VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN), the trusted provider of Internet infrastructure services for the networked world, today announced, effective <strong>July 1, 2010</strong>, an increase in registry domain name fees for .com and .net, per its agreements with ICANN.</p>
<p>VeriSign announced that as of July 1, 2010, the registry fee for .com domain names will increase from $6.86 to $7.34 and that the registry fee for .net domain names will increase, from $4.23 to $4.65.</p>
<p>As the economy and society becomes increasingly dependent on digital technology, it is imperative that investment in the underlying infrastructure, including .com and .net, continue to keep pace with the robust growth of the Internet and ensure its continued security and reliability. Over the last decade, the volume of Internet traffic and domain name system (DNS) queries on VeriSign&#8217;s global infrastructure has increased from an average of approximately 2 billion queries per day in the year 2000 to more than 50 billion queries per day today while maintaining 100 percent operational accuracy and stability for the last eleven years.</p>
<p>Over the next decade, VeriSign will continue investment to build out the .com and .net infrastructures to manage the increasing demands on the infrastructure brought on by the proliferation of Internet-enabled phones and devices and the emergence of DNS-centric technologies and services. VeriSign also continues to scale and fortify the .com and .net infrastructures globally to defend against increasingly sophisticated cyber attacks.</p>
<p>About VeriSign</p>
<p>VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN) is the trusted provider of Internet infrastructure services for the networked world. Billions of times each day, VeriSign helps companies and consumers all over the world engage in communications and commerce with confidence. Additional news and information about the company is available at <a href="http://www.verisign.com/" target="_blank">www.verisign.com</a>.</p>
<p>Trademarks</p>
<p>VeriSign, and other trademarks, service marks, and logos are registered or unregistered trademarks of VeriSign and its subsidiaries in the United States and in foreign countries.</p>
<p>Copyright Copyright 2009 VeriSign, Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>VRSNF</p>
<p>Statements in this announcement other than historical data and information constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause VeriSign&#8217;s actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements. The potential risks and uncertainties include, among others, the uncertainty of future revenue and profitability and potential fluctuations in quarterly operating results due to such factors as increasing competition and pricing pressure from competing services offered at prices below our prices, market acceptance of our existing services and the current global economic downturn, the inability of VeriSign to successfully develop and market new services, VeriSign&#8217;s ability to build out its infrastructure in pace with demand, the uncertainty of whether new services as provided by VeriSign will achieve market acceptance or result in any revenues and the uncertainty of the expense and duration of transition services and requests for indemnification relating to completed divestitures. More information about potential factors that could affect the Company&#8217;s business and financial results is included in VeriSign&#8217;s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in the Company&#8217;s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. VeriSign undertakes no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this press release.</p>
<p>Original source: <a href="https://investor.verisign.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=431292">https://investor.verisign.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=431292</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mieldazys.com/verisign-announces-increase-in-com-net-domain-name-fees/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy promo codes</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/godaddy-promo-codes</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/godaddy-promo-codes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godaddy discount codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godaddy promo codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promo codes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While GoDaddy is biggest and most trusted registrar, I recommend to buy domains only from them. Registerfly gave a good lesson, what could happen if you run a risk and try other registrar (even if it looks good enough). And even more &#8211; you could save money. There are number of promo codes, which give [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While GoDaddy is biggest and <strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">most trusted</span></strong> registrar, I recommend to buy domains <strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">only from them</span></strong>. Registerfly gave a good lesson, what could happen if you run a risk and try other registrar (even if it looks good enough).</p>
<p>And even more &#8211; you could save money. There are number of promo codes, which give you some savings.  Since friends and colleges keep asking me about them, I&#8217;ve decided to post them here and keep updating.</p>
<p><strong>Update June 1, 2010</strong></p>
<p>No one of below provided codes worked, except <strong>gdbb776<strong> &#8211; </strong></strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">$7.68</span> $7.99  /.com renewal &#8211; after icann price increase on July 1, 2010.<strong><strong> </strong></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Update April 2,  2010</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>gda347d</strong> gave $7.17 price for .net renewal and $7.66 for .com one.  Should work for new domain registrations too.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Past codes</strong></p>
<p><strong>OYH7</strong> &#8211; $7.49 +0.20 ICANN fee  .com domains (and <strong>renewals too</strong>) &#8211; sometimes works for other domain extensions too.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>goaz006c</strong> &#8211; 6.99+ICANN fee for<strong> new .com domain registrations</strong></span> &#8211; works for multiple year registrations (+ free whois privacy protection if you register 5 new domains at once)</p>
<p><strong>goaorg01a</strong> &#8211; worked for .org renewal ($7.49 + ICANN fee), should work for new .org registrations too.  7/10/2009</p>
<p><strong>gdbb776</strong> &#8211; worked for .net renewal ($7.50 + ICANN fee) 7/10/2009</p>
<p><strong>ZINE5</strong> &#8211; 10% off anything</p>
<p><strong>ZINE6</strong> &#8211; $5 discount on all orders $30 or more</p>
<p>Old, but usually working codes:</p>
<p><strong>hash3 or OYH3</strong> &#8211; pay $7.49 instead of 9.99 for each .com domains. If you pay for more than 1 year, $2.50 discount applies for each year.</p>
<p><strong>OYH2</strong> &#8211; $5 discount for any services, if total order amount is over $30 (best to use, when keeping total amount is ~ 30$ )</p>
<p><strong>OYH1</strong> &#8211; 10% discount for any purchase at GoDaddy (not only domains &#8211; includes all services)</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mieldazys.com/godaddy-promo-codes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RegisterFly Scandal Culminates in Class Action Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-scandal-culminates-in-class-action-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-scandal-culminates-in-class-action-lawsuit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 75,000 individuals have already lost their Internet domain names registered through RegisterFly.com. New class action lawsuit seeks to protect up to a million more from the same fate. Winston/Salem, NC &#8211; March 28, 2007 &#8211; Yesterday, a U.S. District Court judge unsealed a class action lawsuit against Internet domain registrar RegisterFly along with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b></b><i></i><u></u>More than 75,000 individuals have already lost their Internet domain names registered through RegisterFly.com. New class action lawsuit seeks to protect up to a million more from the same fate.</p>
<p>Winston/Salem, NC &#8211; March 28, 2007 &#8211; Yesterday, a U.S. District Court judge unsealed a class action lawsuit against Internet domain registrar RegisterFly along with the corporation charged with accreditation and oversight of registrars, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (&#8220;ICANN&#8221;), among others. The lawsuit (Anne Martinez v RegisterFly, ICANN et. al.) filed by Attorney E. Clarke Dummit alleges that RegisterFly has systematically defrauded its customers who attempted to register or renew Internet domain names, causing them to lose their domain names, finances, and even entire businesses. The lawsuit was initially sealed due to fears of retribution by RegisterFly.com towards plaintiff Anne Martinez for filing the suit, but since then  other concerns have become more pressing, and the case was opened to the public.</p>
<p>Lead Plaintiff Anne Martinez fears that RegisterFly is likely to cause the loss of her website GoCertify.com, which is the primary source of support for her and her children. The GoCertify.com domain, which had a scheduled expiration date of March 18, 2007, according to Registerfly, could not be renewed (even though Anne was charged for the service of having that done), was refused transfer to a different registrar, and has had Anne&#8221;s ownership information completely removed or concealed from public databases as well as made inaccessible to her.  Martinez says, &#8220;if Medina illegally shuts down my registration, I could end up losing my business that has supported me for years, and even my home, and I am only one of thousands of people in this same situation. I can not just stand by and let this happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Long before the allegations of misuse of RegisterFly funds by company owner Kevin Medina for such things as escort service; a liposuction procedure;  a penthouse apartment in Miami, Florida; and a $6,000  Chihuahua dog,  RegisterFly had already earned a growing reputation for failing to renew or transfer domain names, respond to customer support issues, and double or triple charge for services never delivered. It was clear that RegisterFly was in trouble, and the accreditation agency of registrars, ICANN, knew it, but ICANN did not perform its duty to protect the public and continued to accredit RegisterFly and allow it to perform as a registrar.</p>
<p>In fact, ICANN, which collects a fee for every domain sold through its accredited registrars, did not give notice of termination of ICANN&#8221;s accreditation of RegisterFly until the day AFTER attorney Dummit served ICANN with this class action lawsuit. This provides further evidence that it is time for the American Legal System to step in and reign in this outrageous, illegal behavior that has already harmed many people around the world, and threatens to damage many more.</p>
<p>&#8220;I only hope that this situation can be brought under control before it becomes even worse, and that the agents responsible for all of this harm and heartache will be held accountable for what they have done,&#8221; says Martinez.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://www.registerfly-lawsuit.com/">http://www.registerfly-lawsuit.com</a> for details and recent updates according Class Action Lawsuit against Registerfly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-scandal-culminates-in-class-action-lawsuit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Registerfly Customers: How to Regain Control for Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-customers-how-to-regain-control-for-domains</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-customers-how-to-regain-control-for-domains#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regain control for domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably noticed, due to Registerfly system troubles there&#8221;s impossible to remove ProtectFly (whois protection service) for some domains. In such case, your contact information isn&#8221;t displayed, so it&#8221;s impossible to transfer such domains to other registrar. Fortunately, there&#8221;s solution. It worked for me and for others. Go to the Registerfly site and open [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i></i><u></u>As you probably noticed, due to Registerfly system troubles there&#8221;s impossible to remove ProtectFly (whois protection service) for some domains. In such case, your contact information isn&#8221;t displayed, so it&#8221;s impossible to transfer such domains to other registrar.</p>
<p>Fortunately, there&#8221;s solution. It worked for me and for others.</p>
<ol>
<li>Go to the Registerfly site and open a new account. Select a new log-in name (user ID) when creating the account.</li>
<li>Log-in to the old account and select drop down menu item &#8220;Change of Ownership&#8221;. Perform an internal push of domains to the other user log-in (User ID).</li>
<li> You will receive a notification email indicating the new Registrant information.</li>
<li><strong>When you log into the new account, Protectfly should be gone and you should be able to unlock the domain and obtain the authorization codes.</strong></li>
</ol>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-customers-how-to-regain-control-for-domains/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Termination of RegisterFly.com Registrar Accreditation Agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/termination-of-registerfly-com-registrar-accreditation-agreement</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/termination-of-registerfly-com-registrar-accreditation-agreement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registrar Accreditation Termination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news is in. This is it and official, ICANN has in fact stripped Registerfly of the Accreditation effective IMMEDIATELY! ICANN today issued a formal notice of termination of RegisterFly.com&#8221;s Registration Accreditation Agreement (RAA). ICANN has issued a letter to RegisterFly indicating that it will cease operating as an ICANN-Accredited Registrar on March 31, 2007. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news is in.  This is it and official, ICANN has in fact stripped Registerfly of the Accreditation effective IMMEDIATELY!</p>
<blockquote><p>ICANN today issued a formal notice of <b>termination of RegisterFly</b>.com&#8221;s Registration Accreditation Agreement (RAA).</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>ICANN has issued a letter to RegisterFly indicating that it will cease operating as an 	ICANN-Accredited Registrar on March 31, 2007. Under the terms of the 	Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), ICANN must provide 15 days 	written notice to RegisterFly of its intention to terminate.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Effective immediately ICANN has terminated RegisterFly&#8221;s right to use the ICANN Accredited Registrar logo on its website.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Between now and 31 March RegisterFly is required to unlock and 	provide all necessary Authinfo codes to allow domain name transfers to 	occur. Any and all registrants wishing to transfer away from 	RegisterFly during this period should be allowed to do so efficiently 	and expeditiously.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Terminating accreditation is the strongest measure ICANN is able to 	take against RegisterFly under its powers,&#8221; Dr. Paul Twomey, President 	and CEO of ICANN said today.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;ICANN has been frustrated and distressed by recent management 	confusion inside RegisterFly,&#8221; Dr. Twomey, President said. &#8220;I 	completely understand the greater frustration and enormous difficulty 	that this has created for registrants.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>When the Agreement is terminated, ICANN can approve a bulk transfer 	of all current RegisterFly domain names to another ICANN accredited 	Registrar.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Of course, RegisterFly does not have to wait till then. They can 	request ICANN to approve a bulk transfer immediately. I call on 	RegisterFly to act in the interests of registrants and seek such a 	transfer from us straight away,&#8221; Dr. Twomey said.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>ICANN intends to hold a forum to discuss the reform of the 	Accreditation policy and process at its Lisbon meeting in a week&#8221;s 	time*.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>A set of questions and points to inform the discussion will be made public prior to the Lisbon meeting.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>* The <a href="http://www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/">Lisbon meeting</a> is one of three meetings held a year by ICANN to meet with global stakeholders. It will take place from 26-30 March 2007.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can read this on the <a title="ICANN Terminates Registerfly" href="http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-16mar07.htm" target="_blank">ICANN website here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mieldazys.com/termination-of-registerfly-com-registrar-accreditation-agreement/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some better news according Registerfly &#124; registerfly news</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/some-better-news-according-registerfly</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/some-better-news-according-registerfly#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick announcement. John and Glenn have re-gained control of Registerfly and the site was down due to them moving it over to the new server. So this domain name successfully transferred away from Kevin Medina and is now under full control of John and Glenn along with Mark Klein. Update: Later same day (March 6th) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick announcement.  John and Glenn have re-gained control of Registerfly and the site was down due to them moving it over to the new server.  So this domain name successfully transferred away from Kevin Medina and is now under full control of John and Glenn along with Mark Klein.</p>
<p>Update:  Later same day (March 6th) site was online, I&#8221;ve initiated most urgent transfers and could login to RegisterFly account for obtaining authorization codes. However, members area worked not properly, needed big patience in order to change whois protection status, also for some domains couldn&#8221;t change contact information at all (was attempting to enter own instead of Protectfly, but was getting errors). Also, authorization code for 1 domain was invalid.</p>
<p>Let&#8221;s hope, that things would go better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mieldazys.com/some-better-news-according-registerfly/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RegisterFly Update &#8211; March 2nd, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-update-march-2nd-2007</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-update-march-2nd-2007#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICANN provides the following update: As is already known on 21 February 2007, ICANN issued a letter to RegisterFly [PDF, 101K] indicating a Notice of Breach of its Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) and demanding that RegisterFly act within 15 working days to cure the breaches outlined in the letter. Also on 21 February, ICANN sent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICANN provides the following update:</p>
<ul>
<li>As is already known on 21 February 2007, ICANN issued a <a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/registerfly-notice-of-breach-21feb07.pdf">letter to RegisterFly</a> [PDF, 101K] indicating a Notice of Breach of its Registrar 	Accreditation Agreement (RAA) and demanding that RegisterFly act within 	15 working days to cure the breaches outlined in the letter.</li>
<li>Also on 21 February, ICANN sent a <a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/pritz-to-stansbury21feb07.pdf">Notice of Audit</a> [PDF, 60K] that required RegisterFly to allow ICANN to inspect and copy 	records as well as a notice to submit data to ICANN or a reputable 	escrow agent regarding registration applications and Registered name 	holders.</li>
<li>On 27 February 2007, ICANN sent two employees to 	RegisterFly offices in New Jersey to audit them and obtain the 	registrant information.</li>
<li>RegisterFly has not complied. On 1 March 2007 RegisterFly&#8221;s lawyers forwarded a <a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/mirzaian-to-pritz-01mar07.pdf">letter</a> [PDF, 12K] to ICANN advising that refusal to comply with ICANN&#8221;s 	request &#8220;should not be construed as my client&#8221;s unwillingness to 	cooperate with ICANN but as evidence of their continuing efforts to 	service their customers.&#8221;</li>
<li>In response ICANN has issued a <a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/levee-to-mirzaian-02mar07.pdf">second letter</a> [PDF, 288K] dated 2 March 2007 setting out additional breaches of the 	Registrar Agreement. In that letter ICANN describes RegisterFly&#8221;s 	statement that refusal to comply is evidence of customer service as 	&#8220;preposterous.&#8221;</li>
<li>RegisterFly&#8221;s continuing breaches of the RAA are serious and will be pursued.</li>
<li>ICANN&#8221;s primary concern is to do what it can to protect registrant and related data.</li>
<li>ICANN has provided notice that it will file a suit against 	RegisterFly in the United States District Court for the Central 	District of California seeking a temporary restraining order (TRO) 	requiring RegisterFly to turn over the data requested and to compel an 	emergency audit of its books and records.</li>
<li>In addition to this legal action, ICANN today convened a 	telephone conference among those needed to implement a plan that will 	help cease unintended deletions. The participants were registries 	holding RegisterFly names: Afilias (.info), Newstar (.biz), VeriSign 	(.com, .net), RegisterFly backend services provider Tucows and eNom 	(for which RegisterFly was a reseller) as well as representatives of 	RegisterFly.</li>
<li>The Registries involved have agreed to move any RegisterFly 	names in Redemption Grace Period* status into Server-Delete-Prohibited 	status. This will prevent them from being deleted from the registry and 	becoming available for re-registration by others. ICANN commends and 	encourages this example of cooperation to protect registrant data.</li>
<p>ICANN will provide further updates as new information is available and action taken.</p>
<p>Media Contacts:</p>
<p>Paul Levins</p>
<p>Executive Officer and Vice President Corporate Affairs ICANN<br />
Ph: +1 310 301 5804 E:   paul.levins &#8211; at &#8211; icann.org</p>
<p>International<br />
Andrew Robertson, Edelman ( London)<br />
Ph: +44 7921 588 770<br />
E:   andrew.robertson &#8211; at &#8211; edelman.com</p>
<p>* (Registration Grace Period is a period that allows the domain-name registrant, registrar, or registry operator time to detect and correct any mistaken deletions. During the grace period, the deleted name will be placed on REGISTRY-HOLD, which will prevent the name from functioning/resolving. This tends to call attention to the impending deletion).</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mieldazys.com/registerfly-update-march-2nd-2007/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official Statement from Registerfly</title>
		<link>http://www.mieldazys.com/official-statement-from-registerfly</link>
		<comments>http://www.mieldazys.com/official-statement-from-registerfly#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registerfly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mieldazys.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Written by John Naruszewicz &#124; Glenn Stansbury 5:28 PM Est. today Feb. 22, 2007. We have a statement from Registerfly. After brief phone conversation with John Naruszewicz he said that they have the statement and I had received this from them in word format in it&#8221;s entirety. Please read on! We at Registerfly.Com would like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[